CASE STUDY — FOOD & BEVERAGE / PALLETISING / AU
Food manufacturer
NAME WITHHELD AT CUSTOMER REQUEST
A food manufacturer replaced manual palletising with an ARR rental system. Installed in a single business day with production running throughout, it lifted throughput, lowered operating costs and took the lifting off the team — and the cash that would have gone to CapEx went to new product launches instead.
End-of-line palletising was a manual handling task: repetitive lifting, physical strain on the team, and a workplace injury claims history to go with it. Automating it the conventional way meant an upfront capital purchase — money the business would rather keep in reserve for product launches and growth.
The rental model changed the shape of the decision. A monthly payment instead of a capital outlay meant the operation could automate without touching its cash reserves, and could weigh the system on operating cost rather than on a business case for capital.
ARR supplied a robotic palletising system programmed for the line. Installation took one business day and production continued throughout — no operational downtime. ARR provided operator training, technical support and operational data insights so the system could be tuned after go-live. When a damaged component needed replacing during the service period, ARR processed and resolved it within standard service timelines.
“The rental framework allowed [the business] to deploy automation while maintaining financial flexibility. The system met the company’s requirements for safety, productivity, and cost efficiency.”
HEAD OF OPERATIONS, FOOD MANUFACTURER — FROM A WRITTEN REFERENCE
- [R—01]
Throughput efficiency increased and operating costs fell compared with the previous manual handling process.
- [R—02]
Manual handling reduced — lower physical strain on personnel and fewer workplace injury claims.
- [R—03]
Liquidity preserved: cash reserves went to new product launches and other growth initiatives instead of automation CapEx.
- [R—04]
One damaged component over the service period, replaced within standard service timelines.
The system met the company’s requirements for safety, productivity and cost efficiency, and the business kept its financial flexibility intact — automation deployed without a line on the capital plan.
SAME MODEL. YOUR PRODUCT.